Greenland and the new Arctic power struggle

Lying between the United States and Russia, Greenland has emerged as a critical geopolitical frontline as rapid Arctic warming reshapes the region. Long viewed as remote and inaccessible, the island is now at the centre of growing strategic competition driven by climate change, shifting trade routes, and the race for critical resources. This importance was highlighted when Donald Trump openly suggested that the United States could seek to acquire the island from Denmark, a fellow Nato member—remarks that were initially dismissed but are now seen as an early indicator of how melting ice is transforming the Arctic into a zone of strategic rivalry.

The climate crisis is dramatically shrinking Arctic sea ice and the Greenland ice sheet, unlocking areas of ocean that were previously impassable. Over the past five years, average Arctic sea-ice extent has fallen to around 4.6 million square kilometres, a 27% decline compared with the 1981–2010 average. The scale of ice loss is comparable to the size of Libya. During summer months, sea ice no longer reaches parts of the Russian and Canadian coasts, exposing open waters around the North Pole and fundamentally altering Arctic geography.

One of the most significant consequences is the growing viability of Arctic shipping routes. As polar seas remain ice-free for longer periods, passages once navigable only by icebreakers are becoming commercial corridors. The Northern Sea Route, running along Russia’s Arctic coast, is the most developed and is central to Moscow’s economic and strategic ambitions. The North-West Passage through Canada’s Arctic archipelago and a potential trans-polar route across the North Pole are also gaining attention. These routes could shorten travel between western Europe and east Asia by nearly half, offering alternatives to chokepoints such as the Suez Canal. In 2025, the container ship Istanbul Bridge completed the first liner voyage from China to the UK via the Northern Sea Route, underscoring the rapid pace of change.

Despite these developments, Arctic shipping remains risky. Ice conditions are unpredictable, and vessels still become trapped even during summer. Russia is investing heavily in nuclear icebreakers to enable year-round navigation, but operational challenges continue to limit reliability. Nonetheless, traffic is rising sharply: transits through the Bering Strait increased by 175% between 2010 and 2024.

These changes are intensifying geopolitical tensions. Several Arctic nations—including the US, Russia, Canada, Denmark, and Norway—are advancing territorial claims under international law. The US maintains a significant military presence in the region, including at Pituffik Space Base in north-west Greenland, which supports missile warning, defence, and space operations. Russia has expanded its Arctic military infrastructure, while China has declared itself a “near-Arctic state” and increased its presence, including deploying icebreakers.

Beyond security, Greenland is central to the global race for critical minerals. The island holds some of the world’s largest rare-earth deposits, including Kvanefjeld and Tanbreez, attracting growing foreign interest. Although mining has so far been constrained by ice cover and inaccessibility, retreating glaciers are beginning to expose new resources. As climate change accelerates, Greenland is increasingly becoming a focal point where environmental transformation, economic opportunity, and great-power competition intersect.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/15/greenland-new-shipping-routes-hidden-minerals-and-a-frontline-between-the-us-and-russia